Notice: Our website is currently undergoing a migration, and some content may have been moved to a new location, be actively migrated, or be temporarily inaccessible. We appreciate your patience as we continue to add content gradually over time.
History of Tables of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) Units

History of Tables of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) Units

  1. The Army has always divided its organizations between those that perform specific tasks and tactical units operating in the field. During the nineteenth century the Army called these categories staff and line. The staff consisted of various departments and corps, including The Adjutant General's Department, Quartermaster Department, Medical Department, Corps of Engineers, Ordnance Department, and Signal Corps. The line consisted of cavalry, artillery, and infantry regiments. The former may be considered the predecessors of today's TDA units, while the latter may be thought of as today's table of organization and equipment (TOE) units. Personnel from both staff and line manned installations and geographic departments. Congress directly authorized personnel for the line regiments, and their personnel "tables" were included in the public statutes. This system of designating the internal structure of line units continued to be part of the statutes as late as the National Defense Act of 1916. While Congress also authorized the strength and structure of the corps and departments in public statutes, additional personnel for these staffs came from men detailed from the line regiments and from civilian employees.
  2. During the early years of the twentieth century, although no line units above the regimental level were authorized except during wartime, the Army staff began planning for higher-level organizations in the event of war. Tables of organization were included in Field Service Regulations, published in 1905, for both line regiments and for echelons above the regimental level, i.e. divisions, corps, and field armies. Units above the regimental level continued to be manned provisionally. Tables of organization, similar to those in use today, were first published in 1914.
  3. Tables of organization and tables of allowances (equipment) were published separately until 1943, when they were consolidated as tables of organization and equipment (TOEs). Tables of allowances were also published for installations, schools, departments, etc., and in 1936 the term "table of distribution" was adopted for the document that authorized personnel for such units. In 1943 the tables of distribution and tables of allowances were also consolidated into tables of distribution and allowances (TDAs).
  4. TDA units are organized to perform specific missions for which there are no appropriate TOEs and are discontinued as soon as their assigned missions have been accomplished. Unlike TOE units, TDA organizations are considered non-deployable, even when organized overseas, as their missions are normally tied to a geographic location. The personnel of TDA organizations can be military, civilian, or a combination of both. In some instances, provisional-type units have been organized under TDAs until suitable TOEs were established. Examples are some of the mobile army surgical hospitals (MASHs) and a ranger company organized in Korea during the Korean War. When the Army developed TOEs, the TDA organizations were discontinued.
  5. A TOE prescribes the normal mission, organizational structure, and personnel and equipment requirements for a military unit and is the basis for an authorization document. Units are constituted and activated in accordance with an approved TOE or modified TOE. All personnel are military, and the unit can be deployed anywhere in the world. Some current TOE organizations have TDA augmentations, which may include civilians and foreign personnel, to assist in performing their non-tactical missions. These augmentations are not deployable, however.
  6. Although TDA and TOE units are distinct types of organizations, there are some instances in which either could be used, the military police company at a garrison or installation, for example. A TOE military police company can perform the function, but such units are deployable, and in the event of war the post conceivably might be left without military police support. If the post TDA includes the military police function, then the personnel and equipment authorizations remain with the post regardless of war or other contingencies.
  7. The sustainment base of the Army is made up of TDA-type units, and the number of personnel assigned to them fluctuates. In 1905 34 percent of officers in the Regular Army were assigned or detailed to organizations other than line units. The number had risen to 45 percent by 1911 and to approximately 50 percent by 1921. Throughout the 1930s the number of officers in TDA-type units remained at about 60 percent of the authorized officer strength. With the mobilization of forces in 1940-41, this percentage dropped to about 45 percent. In June 1989, as the Army began its current reduction, the Active component had 55 percent of its authorized officer strength (43,929 of 80,066), 24 percent of its authorized warrant officer strength (3,474 of 15,415), 22 percent of its authorized enlisted strength (126,195 of 578,322), and almost 100 percent of its authorized civilian strength (397,783 of 397,790) in TDA units.

Prepared by DAMH-FPO/30 May 1995

Cookie Disclaimer - CMH Online does not use persistent cookies (persistent tokens that pass information back and forth from the client machine to the server). CMH Online may use session cookies (tokens that remain active only until you close your browser) in order to make the site easier to use. CMH Online DOES NOT keep a database of information obtained from these cookies. You can choose not to accept these cookies and still use the site, but it may take you longer to fill out the same information repeatedly and clicking on the banners may not take you to the correct link. Refer to the help information in your browser software for instructions on how to disable cookies.

External Links Disclaimer - The appearance of hyperlinks to external sites does not constitute endorsement by the Department of the Army of the linked web site or the information, products or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation sites, the Department of the U.S. Army does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this web site.

Migration Notice - The Center for Military History has recently completed the initial migration process to a new content management system (CMS). Please note that not all content has been migrated over yet, but it will be gradually transferred over time. If you are unable to find specific content, feel free to send us an inquiry, and our team would be happy to assist you in locating the information you need.

Inquiries - For inquiries related to organizational history, military programs, or research at the U.S. Army Center of Military History (CMH), please email CMH Answers at usarmy.mcnair.cmh.mbx.answers@army.mil. Due to high correspondence volume, response times may vary. Before reaching out, review the Army Records Master List, FAQs, and Online Bookshelves. On-site research appointments require one week’s notice. For more information, please visit the CMH website at https://history.army.mil/About-CMH/Inquiries-and-Visitor-Policy/.